I thought also, with Ringo being so good with children-a knockabout-uncle type-it might not be a bad idea for him to have a children’s song, rather than a very serious song. So it didn’t seem uncool to me to have a pretty surreal idea that was also a children’s idea. In fact, Paul told author Barry Miles, “ I was thinking of it as a song for Ringo, which it eventually turned out to be…I quite like children’s things I like children’s minds and imagination. To accomplish this, Paul’s original tale was populated by many submarines of vivid colors, but as McCartney honed the story, it became the narrative of one yellow submarine and the magical people aboard this legendary vessel. 1.) Sir Paul’s Explanation – Paul says he was trying to create “ a story, a sort of an ancient mariner, telling the young kids where he’d lived.” Tim Riley points out that Paul wanted to create a song “suited to the drummer’s humble charm,” (3) an enchanted story of a lovely life beneath the sea.It worked.īut almost as soon as the LP was released, critics began to offer up far-flung, complex explanations of the magical song’s “deep and hidden meanings.” Here are just a few: Paul’s placing of Ringo in the classic role of storyteller for “Yellow Submarine” was ideal. Conductor on Shining Time’s (Series One) Thomas the Tank Engine show and his I Wanna Be Santa Claus CD years later). Ringo possessed a gentleness that appealed to many people, including children. And this is Ringo’s Revolver song, written in his tight vocal range and fitted for his “down-to-earth,” genuine personality. The thing is…every single Beatles LP included a song for Ringo. I can just imagine Paul “laying in bed in the Asher’s garret,” (2) working on the lyrics for “ Yellow Submarine.” I can almost see the glimmer in his eye as he imagines what the “average Jill or Joe,” the scholarly professor, and the protester are going to make of his “simple children’s song.” It must have amused him. Similarly, Paul once said, “Personally, I think you can put any interpretation you want on anything! But when someone suggests that “Can’t Buy Me Love” is about a prostitute, I draw the line! That’s going too far.” (1) But other than these two exceptions, as a rule, The Beatles welcomed the public’s multi-colored explanations of Beatles lyrics. In fact, only one or two times did the lads insist that the public’s comments about their lyrics was “dead wrong.” Toward the end of his life, John Lennon was adamant that “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds” was not about LSD! (And Paul McCartney backed him up on this). The Beatles were very lenient with the public’s interpretations of their songs.
0 kommentar(er)
